TurboTenant vs Innago: which fits your rentals in 2026?
Pricing and features verified from vendor pricing pages on 2026-07-04.
Some links on this page are affiliate links — if you sign up through them we may earn a commission at no cost to you. It never affects rankings or verdicts, which are derived from published pricing and feature data. If a vendor's public offer is better than our link, we say so. How we make money.
Both have free plans, so the decision comes down to where each one hides its costs — check the per-transaction and tenant-side fees in the tables above, because those are what you (or your tenants) will actually pay. Who each fits: Cost-conscious DIY landlords with 1-10 doors who want free core tools and don't mind tenants absorbing the fees. Small-to-mid-size landlords who want a genuinely free, full tenant-management workflow and don't mind tenant-side payment fees.
Pricing, side by side
| Starting price | Free tier | Free tier |
| Pricing model | flat (unlimited rentals) | flat |
| Plans | Free — $0/mo Unlimited rentals; marketing, applications, screening, rent collection, maintenance tracking; tenants pay $55 screening and $2 ACH fee; lease agreements sold a la carte Essentials — $12.42/mo $149/yr billed annually; adds lease agreements/e-sign and other perks; tenants still pay $2 ACH fee Pro — $16.58/mo $199/yr billed annually; tenant ACH fee waived, screening drops to $45, faster rent payouts (2-4 days vs 5-7) | Free — $0/mo No monthly fee, no setup fee, no contract; unlimited units — revenue comes from tenant-side transaction and screening fees |
| Annual discount | Displayed prices are annual billing ($149/yr Essentials, $199/yr Pro) | — |
| Tenant screening | $55 paid by applicant on the Free plan; $45 on the Pro plan | $30 paid by applicant for credit + criminal reports, $35 with eviction history added |
Feature checklist
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tenant screening | ✓ | ✓ |
| Online rent collection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Accounting & reporting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Maintenance tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Listing syndication | ✓ | ✓ |
| Leases & e-sign | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrated banking | — | — |
| Landlord mobile app | ✓ | ✓ |
Strengths and trade-offs
TurboTenant
For- Genuinely usable free plan with unlimited rentals — capped max cost of $199/yr
- Applicant-paid screening means $0 landlord cost to vet tenants
- One-click listing syndication and lead management included free
- Large ecosystem — 1M+ landlords, lots of educational content and templates
- Monetized via renter fees: $55 screening and $2-per-ACH-payment fee on the free plan land on your tenants
- Full accounting requires a separate paid REI Hub subscription
- State lease agreements cost extra unless you're on a paid plan
- Rent payouts take 5-7 business days unless you pay for Pro
Innago
For- Entirely free for landlords — no monthly, setup, per-unit, or per-lease fees
- Free lease templates and unlimited eSignatures included
- Full tenant workflow: applications, screening, invoicing, maintenance in one place
- Frequently praised responsive human support
- Tenants pay $2 per ACH payment and 2.99% for cards unless the landlord absorbs it
- No integrated banking or high-yield cash accounts
- Accounting is lighter than Stessa or Buildium; larger operators often pair it with QuickBooks
Frequently asked questions
Is TurboTenant cheaper than Innago?
TurboTenant has a free plan; paid tiers start at $12.42/mo (flat (unlimited rentals)). Innago is free for landlords — it monetizes through tenant-side fees instead of subscriptions. Subscription price isn't the whole story — compare tenant-side ACH and screening fees too. Screening: TurboTenant $55 paid by applicant on the Free plan; $45 on the Pro plan; Innago $30 paid by applicant for credit + criminal reports, $35 with eviction history added.
What does TurboTenant have that Innago doesn't?
At the feature-checklist level they match; the differences are in depth, fees, and support quality — see the full comparison above.
Which is better for a small landlord with 1–5 units?
Cost-conscious DIY landlords with 1-10 doors who want free core tools and don't mind tenants absorbing the fees. Small-to-mid-size landlords who want a genuinely free, full tenant-management workflow and don't mind tenant-side payment fees. If you're still unsure, start with whichever has the free tier — you can export your data and switch later.